Do you suppose we’ll see any justice for Epstein’s victims now?
What happens when reasonableness as determined by conventional standards comes into direct conflict with rationality as determined by your own individual judgment?
It is disgusting and infuriating to me that academia has become a place where pedophiles can masquerade as serious researchers—”scientists”—and thereby defend at great length, over a period of decades, their thoroughly evil sexual proclivities.
They aren’t called pedophiles because they love children.
They’re called pedophiles because they love to rape children.
Australia’s ABC ordered journalists not to refer to child rapists as “pedophiles,” because that would hurt the feelings of pedophiles. Never mind that pedophiles are evil (see larrysanger.org/2019/12/why-pedo…).
They could have called Discord “Concord.”
I guess they didn’t, because they think “Discord” sounds cooler and edgier.
I’m waiting for an ultra-cool, ultra-edgy startup called “Evil” or “Wicked.” Maybe “Lucifer.” Now that’s edgy!
We’re not supposed to notice that the Bible is 100x edgier and more offensive to certain postmodern sensibilities than anything recently canceled.
That’s by design. “Last week we canceled Dr. Seuss, and now you’re defending the Bible? Monster!”
We oughta decentralize social media. I’m doing my part by posting this from my microblog. It just happens to be mirrored on Twitter. It’s a matter of getting the right tools into the hands of the people. @ks_found is building one >
Payment services, like the whole financial industry, are a massive grift that depends on differentials in knowledge (including technical knowledge) and sheer boldness. This applies every bit as much to crypto as to everything else.
This is not my country. This is some new, much worse country>